A Taser, via Wikimedia Commons

A measure passed by the City Council last night would afford Baltimore residents a new form of electrically charged protection.

In a 14-1 vote, council members approved a bill authorizing city dwellers โ€œto possess and use an electronic control device as a form of non-lethal self-defense in the home and in public.โ€ The phrase โ€œelectronic control devicesโ€ generally refers to Tasers, which can shoot electrodes at a person and shock the bejeezus out of them.

There are plenty of places Baltimoreans still would be barred from using stun guns, namely schools and state- and city-owned public buildings. Additionally, the bill prohibits possession of one by any person โ€œwho poses an unacceptable risk to public safety,โ€ including those diagnosed as mentally defective or who have been committed to a mental institution, as well as anyone placed under a restraining order.

The bill text cites a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings from 2008 through last year that protect Americansโ€™ rights to own firearms for โ€œlawful purposesโ€ such as self-defense. The most recent ruling, Caetano v. Massachusetts, determined stun guns are a Second Amendment-protected weapon, rendering state bans on the weapons constitutional.

In February, state lawmakers repealed Marylandโ€™s stun gun ban under pressure from a lawsuit filed by gun rights supporters. Lawsuits in Howard and Baltimore counties yielded the same results for local ordinances.

Mayor Catherine Pugh will still need to approve the bill for it to become law. A spokesman from her office hasnโ€™t returned a request for comment on whether she plans to do so.

Ethan McLeod is a freelance reporter in Baltimore. He previously worked as an editor for the Baltimore Business Journal and Baltimore Fishbowl. His work has appeared in Bloomberg CityLab, Next City and...