A recent article in The Examiner compared the sources and sizes of Baltimore’s Democratic mayoral candidates’ campaign funds.
In terms of cash on hand, incumbent Stephanie Rawlings-Blake finds herself in an almost luxuriously comfortable lead with $1.4 million. Compare that to the funds of Catherine Pugh or Otis Rolley, the mayor’s stiffest competition, who have each raised around $250,000 over the course of the entire campaign.
Rawlings-Blake’s money tends to come from unions and businesses; Rolley’s from individuals; Pugh’s from elected officials, loans, and one Scott Donahoo, a car dealer who donated $75,000 to the Pugh campaign.
Perhaps hoping that distancing himself from our disgraced former mayor was worth $1,000, Rolley returned the grand donated to his campaign by Sheila Dixon. Pugh took it.
What do you think? Do the sources of campaign funds give us important information about the candidates? Or is it just another distraction from the real issues?
Despite the misprint on the sample ballot sent out by the state board of elections, the Democratic primary (which nearly all news outlets are calling “election day”) is September 13.
Latest posts by Robert M. O'Brien (see all)
- Annapolis Legislates Lead Poisoning - March 9, 2012
- The Circus Fires Back at Jada Pinkett Smith - March 8, 2012
- Video Americain Closes Charles Village Location, Not Because of Me - March 8, 2012