When you tune into Poker Night in America, a new cable TV show debuting this spring, keep an eye out for a guy who looks a little bit more like a computer science professor than a professional card shark. He’ll probably be wearing wire frame glasses and a huge grin, since playing poker with seasoned professionals has been Hopkins prof (and poker obsessive) Avi Rubin’s dream ever since he started getting serious about the game a few years ago.
“I have to say, I’m pretty excited about this,” Rubin told the Hopkins Hub. “It’s been a dream of mine to play with some of these guys whom I’ve seen on TV many times.” It’ll be a match to watch, for sure – how often do you see a poker player who correctly uses “whom”?
Casino officials were quick to point out that the fraudulent chips were used at roulette, blackjack, and mini-baccarat tables, not in the poker room. Why does it matter? Well, the poker room is the casino’s pride and joy. According to the Washington Post, it’s regularly the second-busiest poker room in the entire country. And it’s about to break into the big time even more thanks to a $1 million tournament that started this week, and which will be featured on a new TV show called “Poker Night in America.” Which means they really, really don’t want anything to go wrong.
Greg Merson started playing poker to get money for drugs. ” I just have a really addictive personality. I’m just an all-or-nothing type of person,” the Laurel native told ESPN earlier this year. Lucky for him, the draw of poker was more compelling than that of cocaine; in 2007 he got clean and started getting serious — seriously serious — about poker. Last night, Merson triumphed at the World Series of Poker in Las Vegas, coming away with $8.5 million, a gold championship bracelet, and lifetime bragging rights. (He also won me over by wearing an Orioles jersey, so it’s kind of like the Os did win a world series this year — just not the one they expected.)
By day, Avi Rubin is a computer security consultant and a professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins’ Whiting School of Engineering. But by night — and on the weekends, and whenever his wife doesn’t mind too much — Rubin is a poker aficionado, one of those real obsessives with his sights set on the World Series of Poker in Las Vegas. And with a talent for numbers and an obsessive focus on probabilities, he just might end up making it there.
Rubin sees the game in terms of his academic interests — game theory, machine learning, combinatorics. A true computer scientist at heart, he envisioned a poker hand as a finite, countable structure. Once the first cards are dealt (in Texas Hold-Em, each player is dealt two cards face down; five communal cards are dealt faceup), the rest of the game unfolds like a kind of decision tree. Rubin crafted a program to determine the relative probabilities of success given particular variables — his position in the betting, number of opponents, etc. “For any given spot in the decision tree,” he told Johns Hopkins Magazine, “I could come up with a probability distribution of different plays. Then I could write a learning program that I could use as a simulator on the computer and play a thousand times with particular settings, then tweak the settings and run it again to see if I do better, and work backward from it to infer why that was a better play in that situation.”
But because computers can’t yet model the full complexity of playing with real human beings, who bluff/get bored/try to show off/otherwise behave unpredictably, Rubin sat in on weekly games with friends, many of whom were doctors and lawyers. “The lawyers tend to be better,” he says. “The math in poker is basic arithmetic, it’s not that hard. But you still have people, like a lot of the doctors that I play with, who’d rather not bother with all the math. They feel that they have enough intuition for the game.” But that intuitive technique tends to backfire, in Rubin’s experience: “The fundamental math is much more important. If you’re a solid mathematical player, in the long run you’re going to kill the intuitive player.”
Maryland lawmakers have been meeting to hash out the terms of a potential special legislative session to address a tax package, and while Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake is not officially part of that discussion she has made her opinion known: she wants the special session to address the gaming bill (or as Gov. Martin O’Malley calls it, the “silly bomb”) that gummed up the General Assembly’s works at the end of the regular session, though the mayor agrees that the budget shortfall should be fixed first.
Now, Maryland is already getting slots parlors, including one in Baltimore City (which I have a feeling may end up being operated by Caesars Entertainment). The current gambling bill would allow those locations to add table games (for customers who get sick of seeing their cash amount decline on a boring old video screen and prefer to lose their money in a more hands-on way).
political cynicism aside, “table games” means poker, and poker rules! It’s an actual game that involves actual skill (skill I don’t have, but still). Also, if you stick to tournaments there’s a cap on how much money you can lose (which is good for me — I once sat down at a very low-stakes live poker table and lost $50 in 10 minutes).
If Baltimore’s casino ends up offering poker, I will absolutely go and play. Maybe you’ll see me there. I’ll be the guy with sunglasses over regular glasses bluffing every hand.