Silted stormwater runoff going into storm drain in Mount Rainier, MD.

Before this year the average Marylander probably knew little about storm water. Environmentalists used the word. But then, environmentalists do weird things, like pay higher prices for food grown locally.

All that changed April 12. Comedian and Fox News commentator Steven Crowder used the phrase “rain tax” in a Fox Business News segment with anchor Neil Cavuto. They ridiculed Maryland (and its Democratic governor) and specifically utility fees dedicated to reducing polluted runoff.

You have to give it to Fox. They know how to make people sit up and get angry. Critics of the fees in Maryland started using the term “rain tax.” Reporters picked it up in their stories. Suddenly it was in headlines across the state (first in quotes, then without), most recently in Robert O’Brien’s blog in Baltimore Fishbowl, “Nobody Should Like This New Rain Tax, Here’s Why.”

The whole thing reminded me of when my social studies teacher called on a funny kid in class during a lesson on the Louisiana Purchase. His response got us all laughing. Suddenly we were all paying attention. But we didn’t learn much more about the Louisiana Purchase.

In the same way, the “rain tax” hype has made Marylanders generally aware of storm water, but much of the coverage of the topic doesn’t really teach us enough about the problem. While people are still paying attention let me slip in a few facts:

  • This type of pollution is the only major source of water pollution increasing in Maryland.
  • Rain washes dog waste, litter, fertilizer, and other contaminants straight into local creeks, rivers, the Inner Harbor and the Bay. This polluted soup isn’t treated in most places.
  • In many areas of the state polluted runoff is responsible for a major portion of pollution in local rivers and streams.
  • The Maryland Department of the Environment cautions the public not to swim in ANY waterways of the state for 48 hours after a significant storm because stormwater carries harmful bacteria into those waters.
  • If we do this work, not only will our kids be able to safely swim in the water, but we’ll create 178,000 full-time private sector jobs in the region, according to the Economic Policy Institute.
  • The state legislature last year budgeted tens of millions of dollars to help local governments reduce this problem, but also decided Baltimore City and the state’s most populated counties should pony up, too, because that’s where the problem is worse. The localities were asked to raise a fee dedicated only to upgrading their local stormwater systems.
  • Local governments asked that they be given flexibility to decide the size of the fee, and the way it was collected. So it was no surprise this year when different counties passed different fees, one county as low as one cent per household per year.

And here’s one last thing missing from most lampoons of the “rain tax:” an alternative solution. Should we continue to ignore this problem? Should we siphon off money from other government services to upgrade our storm water systems?

I’m willing to pay a little more for a valuable government service, just as I’m willing to pay more for meat from a steer grown here in Maryland. I see value in that investment. But some people just want the least expensive product.

By setting its own storm water fee, whether one cent or something higher, each local government made a similar decision.

Tom Zolper is the Maryland Communications Coordinator for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

3 replies on “Hating on the Rain Tax? CBF Rebuttal Will Make You Reconsider”

  1. There’s something missing from your argument as persuasive as it is. Storm water doesn’t just cause pollution, which as you aptly describe, it does. Storm water causes flooding, the likes of which, we in Maryland never saw in years past. This is a big financial expense for homeowners and businesses alike. For me personally, it has cost me to repair a flooded basement. It costs us all in higher insurance premiums. And storm water is a major cause of erosion, another expensive problem to deal with. So, we can all pay a little now or we can kick the can down the road and pay big money then. It’s like the old oil filter commercial, “You can pay me now or pay me later!” Let’s keep taking the facts to the public like you’ve done because the fight isn’t over yet unfortunately.

  2. Oh, sure. Go on and lobby for spending money on silly things like cleaner water for the Chesapeake Bay. Who needs safe swimming water anyway? That’s what pools are for, right? And there is no tourist revenue from Maryland crab festivals or business revenue from exported crab meat – is there? And why should an innocent citizen off in Cumberland or in Garrett County be forced to pay for keeping runoff water cleaner, when the only watershed out there is some little lake – what’s it called, Deep Creek? Do they count for any business? And business is what counts.

    Give us a break, MR. Environmentalist; we are tired of paying taxes for all kinds of government interference in things like public health and a strong economy. Let us keep our money in our own pocket, and pay for our own health and the economy will be fine…I think.

Comments are closed.